1.   Overview This organisational structure was developed to accommodate a large number of stakeholders.  It was important to ensure that all groups had a say in the organisation while still being held accountable in way. (see table in 3. Description of accountability)   2.  Diagram of Structure   3. Description of accountability

Trustee Representation	Interest Groups	Members	Non/Voting
Staff (3 Trustees)	Field Station Staff (3 Trustees)	Research Station	Voting
		Field Stations	Non voting
Visitors (3 Trustees)	Student and Research Organisations	University Research (International)	Voting
		Scientific Institutions (International)	Voting
		Local schools	Non voting
		Nature Clubs	Non voting
	Tourist Industry	Public Information Centres	Non voting
		Tourist Accommodation	Non voting
		Tourism – Local Governments	Non voting
Land Management	Geopark	UN Organisation	Voting
(3 Trustees)	Forest Services		Voting
	ABC County	Government	Voting
	Farmers	3 Counties	Non voting
XYZ Enterprises	Sustainable Ecosystem Management	Enterprises	Voting
(3 Trustees)	And Resource Stewardship	EU organisation	Non voting
		ABC Country organisation	Non voting
TRUSTEES TOTAL:  12

  4.  Impact on success of organisation The expectation is that this organisational structure will encourage:

• Input from all groups which will ensure that all key information and learning is captured.
• Engagement and commitment from all groups which should increase resources available.
• Trust (transparency, mutual support and consistency) which will improve the decision making process.

  5. Other notes None at this time